tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post4415563753464826031..comments2024-02-16T17:52:44.944-06:00Comments on The Nuclear Green Revolution: Scientific American Hack David Biello Distorts Nuclear TechnologyCharles Bartonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01125297013064527425noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-56157599614653724672012-09-27T10:14:48.571-05:002012-09-27T10:14:48.571-05:00Yes, I am strongly agreed with you, please keep wr...Yes, I am strongly agreed with you, please keep writing like this.Advance Technology Toolshttp://advancetechnologytools.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-66407085453338837382009-06-02T18:28:53.953-05:002009-06-02T18:28:53.953-05:00Argh, I hate this! Let's lynch Biello, journalism...Argh, I hate this! Let's lynch Biello, journalism school graduate! Ha! More like Hollywood hack! That's why they can never get science right in movies - people like him write that crud!<br /><br />Long live sience! Down with Biello!Joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09733729724027854988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-43531379492675901122009-02-01T12:59:00.000-06:002009-02-01T12:59:00.000-06:00Sadly, it seems that many scientific publications ...Sadly, it seems that many scientific publications and organizations have been co-opted by people with agendas that have nothing to do with science.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-42716298179269880892009-01-31T07:00:00.000-06:002009-01-31T07:00:00.000-06:00Aren't you being too kind to Storm van der Leeuwen...Aren't you being too kind to Storm van der Leeuwen by merely describing him as "discredited"? Shouldn't we be linking him to the Club of Rome (IIRC he was their chief secretary in the Netherlands), and their depopulationist agenda?<BR/><BR/>I want people to HATE the anti-nuclear movement as intensely as they hate Nazism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-20624795982994277782009-01-31T02:41:00.000-06:002009-01-31T02:41:00.000-06:00Charles, at a quick glance it looked like Biello w...Charles, at a quick glance it looked like Biello wrote several articles, but I didn't have the heart to read past the first 2 paragraphs of his drivel. I couldn't believe this was coming from SciAm. It's really fallen apart as a reputable magazine.<BR/><BR/>I noted that readers could leave a comment if they were signed in. Perhaps you ought to copy paste your whole article here as a reader comment.Jason Ribeirohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06863185203119704249noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-29374151738047432752009-01-30T19:55:00.000-06:002009-01-30T19:55:00.000-06:00MDF, a replacement or an imposter? This scientifi...MDF, a replacement or an imposter? This scientific can and should not be trusted. i trusted the other one.Charles Bartonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01125297013064527425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-68639425126369445712009-01-30T19:25:00.000-06:002009-01-30T19:25:00.000-06:00American Scientist is the replacement for what Sci...American Scientist is the replacement for what Scientific American used to be. The 2009 Jan-Feb issue has an article on CHP, as well as other interesting subjects. Maybe they can be offered an article article on the LFTR?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7597656451205429515.post-35654680442541526792009-01-30T16:39:00.000-06:002009-01-30T16:39:00.000-06:00I too once enjoyed reading Scientific American. Bu...I too once enjoyed reading Scientific American. But quite often now they choose to leave the dry road of science and instead slog through the swamp of politics.<BR/><BR/>Readers would be much better served with a good article on the LFTR, stating the history, current state of development, and remaining problems to be overcome for commercial deployment. Analysis of energy payback time, fuel availability, waste products, etc. would also be in order.<BR/><BR/>If their current direction keeps up, they should rename themselves the <I>Politicized Science American.</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com