David Hahn, who is also known as the radioactive boy scout, in effect pointed out a clear path to nuclear proliferation. Hahn attempted to build a reactor with americium241 from smoke detectors, and thorium from Coleman lanterns. Ionizing smoke detectors contain minute amounts of americium241. Americium241 is fissionable, but unfortunately for David, who attempted to use it in his back yard reactor, fission can only be achieved by fast neutrons. That makes americium241 potential weapons material, but not good to burn in ordinary reactors. Hahn's approach does open the door for would be bad guys who want to build nuclear weapons on the sly. Just buy a few billion ionizing smoke detectors, extract the americium241, and voilĂ , you have the stuff to make nuclear weapons.
If you get tired of throwing away all of those smoke detectors - this is a real nuclear waste problem you know - you might try try opening your own smoke detector factory. That way you can get all the americium241 you want without the IAEA being any the wiser. Did anyone think to check if A.Q. Khan went into the smoke detector business? I'll bet not. Even as I write this nuclear weapons may be rolling off the assembly lines at the Osama bin Laden Smoke Detector factory. Think about it!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
Contributors
Some neat videos
Nuclear Advocacy Webring Ring Owner: Nuclear is Our Future Site: Nuclear is Our Future |
||||
Get Your Free Web Ring by Bravenet.com |
links The Weinberg Foundation
- The Weinberg Foundation
- Deregulate the Atom
- LFTRS to Power the Planet
- Sustainable Energy Today
- ANS Nuclear Cafe
- Thorium Power
- The Nuclear Alternative
- Yes Vermont Yankee
- Nuclear Townhall
- NNadir's underground blog
- oz-energy-analysis.org
- Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy
- Save The Climate (Sauvons Le Climat0
- The Energy Tribune
- masterresources.org
- Nuclear Fissionary
- Nuclear Archer
- This week in batteries (TWIB)
- Gerald E. Marsh & George S. Stanford on Nuclear Policy
- The Capacity Factor
- Canadian Energy Crisis
- Institute for Energy Research
- Energy from Thorium Documents
- Energy from Thorium Discussion Forum
- Next Big Future
- RadiationAnswers.org
- Knowledge Problems
- Brave New Climate
- Thorium electronuclear
- AREVA Blog
- The Energy Collective
- Climate Change Politics
- Reactor Physics Group Publications
- Alexander DeVolpi on nuclear-weapons nonproliferation
- ECOWorld
- New Papyrus Magazine
- Pronuclear Democrats
- American Energy Independence
- coal2nuclear
- Energy Density
- SUSTAINABLE ENERGY - WITHOUT THE HOT AIR
- The Atomic Show
- Atomic Watch
- Pebble Bed Reactors
- The Thorium fuel cycle
- Simon Nisan on Nuclear Desalination
- Dr. Ralph Moir
- National Wind Watch
- Wind Energy Resource Atlas
- solar calculator
- THE NUCLEAR ENERGY OPTION by Bernard L. Cohen
- Oil Drum
- Solar Buzz
- Clean Brake (Tyler Hamilton)
- GM-Volt
- Fuel Cycle Week
- Depleted Cranium: Dr. Buzzo's Bad Science Blog
- Blogging About the Unthinkable
- Uranium Information
- Frank Munger
- The Information Bridge
- Alvin Weinberg Papers
- Left-Atomics (David Walters)
- bartoncii
- Real CLimate
- 1 nuclear place
- World Nuclear News
- David Walters
- NNadir
- NIE Nuclear Notes
- nuclearstreet
- Idaho Samizdat
- Atomic Insights blog
- Energy from Thorium
- A Musing Environment
4 comments:
Very droll Charles.
More seriously, is there not hazmat programs in the US to recover these things? I know there is one in my neighborhood. Twice a year they have a special hazmat garbage day nothing else is permitted) and a firm comes around in a truck door-to-door to get this stuff.
This is backed up by big fines for trying to send such material out with the regular trash.
I have never heard of a special Hazmet program for smoke detectors.
Well it's not just for those, batteries, old paint, pesticides, etc are all included.
Charles, I've come across an objection to nuclear that I can't answer, perhaps you could take a look at it:
http://anz.theoildrum.com/node/3600#comment-304061
Chris is arguing that nuclear cores can't be re-cycled, and hence are a bad design.
Sounds a pretty far-fetched objection to me, any stick to beat a dog, but we have to be prepared to deal with any reasonable criticism.
Sorry to contact you here, but I have no direct means.
If you want to e-mail me I am on brittanicone2007 at yahoo dot co dot uk
Post a Comment