Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Oil Drum post

There is quite a lively discussion of my Oil Drum post going on this morning.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

CharlesB,

Great post. And great comments. You are doing a great job of educating the masses.

The negative comments boil down to

a) we don't want any cheap energy, just encourages more people/development

b) wind/solar, storage, massive grid, ... can do it all

c) it's not here yet (so don't invest so it will be here in 10yrs)

charlesH

David Walters said...

Yes, it boils down to what CharlesH notes, I think. Amazing no one brought up economics. I thought the discussion on materials for high temperature were interesting all the way around.

The interesting admission by the social-reactionary "Ender" is that "LFTR and mass-molten salt storage for renewables is 'vaporware'. So...basically, they are both vapor ware so why should we choose renewables again????

I think Ender exposes the very reactionary nature of this green percscription: "a DC radio, a lantern"...etc. P O V E R T Y

David

Anonymous said...

In the end Enders agrees we should build LFTR. So I think we are making progress.

charlesH

Charles Barton said...

I was very encouraged by te whole4 discussion. The nuclear opponents were not nearly so setin their opposition asw they were in the past. The seemed more willing to listen.

Followers

Blog Archive

Some neat videos

Nuclear Advocacy Webring
Ring Owner: Nuclear is Our Future Site: Nuclear is Our Future
Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet
Get Your Free Web Ring
by Bravenet.com
Dr. Joe Bonometti speaking on thorium/LFTR technology at Georgia Tech David LeBlanc on LFTR/MSR technology Robert Hargraves on AIM High