Can there be any room for a centrist at a health care reform town hall meeting |
Am I the only person who is getting tired of this? |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
Contributors
Some neat videos
Nuclear Advocacy Webring Ring Owner: Nuclear is Our Future Site: Nuclear is Our Future |
||||
Get Your Free Web Ring by Bravenet.com |
links The Weinberg Foundation
- The Weinberg Foundation
- Deregulate the Atom
- LFTRS to Power the Planet
- Sustainable Energy Today
- ANS Nuclear Cafe
- Thorium Power
- The Nuclear Alternative
- Yes Vermont Yankee
- Nuclear Townhall
- NNadir's underground blog
- oz-energy-analysis.org
- Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy
- Save The Climate (Sauvons Le Climat0
- The Energy Tribune
- masterresources.org
- Nuclear Fissionary
- Nuclear Archer
- This week in batteries (TWIB)
- Gerald E. Marsh & George S. Stanford on Nuclear Policy
- The Capacity Factor
- Canadian Energy Crisis
- Institute for Energy Research
- Energy from Thorium Documents
- Energy from Thorium Discussion Forum
- Next Big Future
- RadiationAnswers.org
- Knowledge Problems
- Brave New Climate
- Thorium electronuclear
- AREVA Blog
- The Energy Collective
- Climate Change Politics
- Reactor Physics Group Publications
- Alexander DeVolpi on nuclear-weapons nonproliferation
- ECOWorld
- New Papyrus Magazine
- Pronuclear Democrats
- American Energy Independence
- coal2nuclear
- Energy Density
- SUSTAINABLE ENERGY - WITHOUT THE HOT AIR
- The Atomic Show
- Atomic Watch
- Pebble Bed Reactors
- The Thorium fuel cycle
- Simon Nisan on Nuclear Desalination
- Dr. Ralph Moir
- National Wind Watch
- Wind Energy Resource Atlas
- solar calculator
- THE NUCLEAR ENERGY OPTION by Bernard L. Cohen
- Oil Drum
- Solar Buzz
- Clean Brake (Tyler Hamilton)
- GM-Volt
- Fuel Cycle Week
- Depleted Cranium: Dr. Buzzo's Bad Science Blog
- Blogging About the Unthinkable
- Uranium Information
- Frank Munger
- The Information Bridge
- Alvin Weinberg Papers
- Left-Atomics (David Walters)
- bartoncii
- Real CLimate
- 1 nuclear place
- World Nuclear News
- David Walters
- NNadir
- NIE Nuclear Notes
- nuclearstreet
- Idaho Samizdat
- Atomic Insights blog
- Energy from Thorium
- A Musing Environment
12 comments:
Charles - I am a bit confused. Is it the lack of real discussion that you are tired of or are you tired of the opinions expressed in the video that you posted?
I thought the video was well done and something that more Americans need to see and think about before shouting down whoever expresses an opinion with which they do not agree. Thanks for sharing it.
Rod, it is people who feel that they can be rude to people who disagree with them about health care related issues, that I am tired of, not the reporter, or the handicapped woman, both of whom were civil about their views.
I'm with Charles here. The whole, quite fake expression of 'democracy' at these townhall meetings is exemplified by those who will not let people express POVs contrary to their own. There have been civil discussions about this complex issue but calling people "Nazis" is simply fighting words in my book and has nothing to do with free speech...in fact it ends free speech.
We need a *discussion* on health care, not this nonsense that passed for it under the guise of the psycho 'tea party' turkies...
David
David and Charles - Agreed. Shouting someone down or interrupting their discussion is not debate. Having been to public meetings, however, I can understand the reasons why they normally apply a reasonable time limit on any one speaker.
These so called town hall events are getting out of hand. Earlier in the week a man who opposes health care reform got into a fight with a prohealth care demonstrator in Thousand Oaks Ca and had part of his finger bitten off. Maybe I would have sympathy for this man if it wasn't for the fact, which he admitted, that he threw two punches at the proreform guy and the second punch landed in the man's mouth. To me it seems like the biter has a good case of self defense because the bitee should not have had his finger in the other man's mouth.
You can read more about this event by clicking on the link below.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/09/town_hall_talk_mans_fingertip.html
Charles
This is America...don't you know you have the right to express your own opinion, as long as it doesn't disagree with mine?
And don't even mention social program with government intervention, lest I call you a communist...
Rob
Rob, as a survivor of the cold war, I find your communism comment to be absurd. Almost every civilized country in the world, has a national health care plan. The United States has the most expensive health care system in the world, but Americans are neither as healthy nor as long lived as people in many countries with national health systems. You right wingers need to get a grip on reality. You need to stop screaming at people who you disagree with. And you need to sytop your silly name calling.
I think Rob was being facetious, not fascistic :).
D.
There is no excuse for rude and inconsiderate behavior from either side of the debate. Elected representatives ought to respect the desire of their constituents to voice their support for, or opposition to, pending legislation.
It is not surprising that many people are reacting strongly to this issue, as they have been called "evil mongers", "un-American", "mobsters" - and that's by the political class!
Citizens are rightly concerned about the attempt to pass such sweeping legislation by Aug 1. Heck, more time was taken deciding on the Obama's pet dog.
We have an example of national health care in the USA - it's the Indian Health Service - and it is exhibit A of inefficiency, bureaucracy and malaise. I have personal experience with the IHS as an intern in 1984 at Chinle, AZ with the Navajo nation.
Wouldn't it make sense to consult with MOC's who actually provide health care services? Rep. Tom Price, Sens. Tom Coburn and Tom Barrasso are practicing physicians and have submitted ideas based on their experience. Rep. Paul Ryan, John Shadegg, Pete Hoekstra and others have presented ideas that would expand choice, portability, limit frivolous lawsuits and cut fraud and waste. Those ideas have been summarily rejected by the majority party.
Certainly, there is the need to insure the chronically uninsurable, but do we need to overturn what 85% of Americans approve of to cover that 5%?
There is a better way to achieve the desired goal. It is worth taking the time to consider all options.
Charles
Sorry you didn't see through my sarcasm, no insult intended. I was indeed being facetious, my apologies!
Rob
Rob, no problejm. Sorry I misunderstood you.
We also have such examples as the Veterans Administration, and Medicare. I heard horror stories about the VA back when I was on active duty, and that was about thirty years ago. It hasn't gotten any better.
If the political class wants me to trust them with my health, they can start earning it by making Medicare, VA, and BIA health care work. Then we'll talk.
Post a Comment