Monday, July 4, 2011

Conservation values

This post dates back to February 2008. Although I do not write often on conservation related topics, nature conservation and protection rate high on the Nuclear Green scale of values. The Earth is our home and we should take care of it. There are significant differences between conservation and green, and one of them is that nuclear power can play an important role in conservation while green ideology is opposed to it. Conservationists ave long been concerned about global warming, while greens prefer burning coal to nuclear power. Conservationist fight against damming more rivers and streams, while greens thinks that left without dams they are going to waste.

Greens must think Tennessee Environmentalist are a bunch of backward hicks who haven't got the word that dams are cool. Back during the 1960's and 70's things were different, and Tennessee environmentalist thought they were on board. TVA finally admitted that the cost of damming the Obed would be far more than the benefits. The Obed River is a beautiful white water river that flows through breathtaking gorges and bluffs of the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee. White water lovers thought out the Southeast and beyond flock to the Obed River and its tributary Daddy's Creek every spring to challenge their rapids. Some know of the fight to preserve the Obed from a TVA dam in the 1960's and 70's, others do not.

There were other East Tennessee fights again TVA dams. Dr. David A. Etnier of the University of Tennessee, fought successfully to save the tiny Snail Darter from an extinction that would have happened if a TVA dam on the Little Tennessee River had been built.

Now the new green party line is that East Tennesseans who fought to save the last wild rivers of East Tennessee from impoundment, were really bad people who were serving the interest of nuclear power by preventing the extension of "green" hydroelectric power. The new green dogma is that every river, creek and trickle in the United States should be dammed, and its impounded waters used to drive hydro-turbines. Forget about natural beauty, forget about recreational uses, forget the wildlife habitat, and forget about cost-benefits analysis. Forget if the dam ever actually will produce much electricity. Just do it. Just dam those things. And let the beauty of every place where water does not flow be spoiled by towering wild generators.

3 comments:

Citizen said...

Cheap solar cells made out of plastics… A new innovation from British researchers…
Information Exchange..: Plastic Solar Cells - A new innovation...

Anon said...

Why is some crap about cheaper solar panels being spammed all over the net?

Oh well, even if solar panels were free they'd still be a bad deal.

Charles Barton said...

Anon, the solar story, is to say the least, faltering. Solar is simply not a cost effective energy source. Solar supporters are grasping at straws. I am, however, going to censor their claims.

Followers

Blog Archive

Some neat videos

Nuclear Advocacy Webring
Ring Owner: Nuclear is Our Future Site: Nuclear is Our Future
Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet Free Site Ring from Bravenet
Get Your Free Web Ring
by Bravenet.com
Dr. Joe Bonometti speaking on thorium/LFTR technology at Georgia Tech David LeBlanc on LFTR/MSR technology Robert Hargraves on AIM High